Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11321 - 11330 of 68502 for did.
Search results 11321 - 11330 of 68502 for did.
2007 WI 9
as imposed by the Supreme Court of Illinois. ¶5 Attorney Neuendorf did not file a response
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27894 - 2007-01-22
as imposed by the Supreme Court of Illinois. ¶5 Attorney Neuendorf did not file a response
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27894 - 2007-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
investigation writer “did perform some actuarial assessment” and scored Zink at a higher number, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89103 - 2012-11-13
investigation writer “did perform some actuarial assessment” and scored Zink at a higher number, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89103 - 2012-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the police did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his car, and that the stop of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74803 - 2011-12-06
argues that the police did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his car, and that the stop of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74803 - 2011-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
copy was filed. 2 He also argued the officer did not fulfill his duties under the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109207 - 2017-09-21
copy was filed. 2 He also argued the officer did not fulfill his duties under the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109207 - 2017-09-21
State v. Floyd Worth
that Worth did not make an appropriate request for the instruction. And even if the lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31
that Worth did not make an appropriate request for the instruction. And even if the lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31
County of Sauk v. Jammie M. Douglas
simply did not support a conclusion that the destruction of the sample was an attempt to affect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6274 - 2005-03-31
simply did not support a conclusion that the destruction of the sample was an attempt to affect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it was not going to include that phrase in the instructions, it did so in reading the preliminary instruction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311557 - 2020-12-10
that it was not going to include that phrase in the instructions, it did so in reading the preliminary instruction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311557 - 2020-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
cause to discharge Wessely from his employment under WIS. STAT. § 230.34(1)(a). The Commission did so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573822 - 2022-10-06
cause to discharge Wessely from his employment under WIS. STAT. § 230.34(1)(a). The Commission did so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573822 - 2022-10-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Program. Nava did not object or request a hearing on the restitution amount. The court entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907084 - 2025-01-28
Program. Nava did not object or request a hearing on the restitution amount. The court entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907084 - 2025-01-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was “[n]ot clear.” The court further remarked that David did “[n]ot [have] a particularly good handle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
was “[n]ot clear.” The court further remarked that David did “[n]ot [have] a particularly good handle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03