Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11321 - 11330 of 41733 for new88v.net 💥🏹 new88 💥🏹 new 88 💥🏹 new88vnet 💥🏹 nha cai new88 💥🏹 new88v.net.

State v. Jessie L. Stokes
In a postconviction motion challenging his sentences, Stokes presented as a “new factor” the fact that prosecutors had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06

State v. Randy A. Davis
for postconviction relief. He claims he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice or based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5835 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert E. Christophel
either claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or contend that a “new factor” warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4156 - 2017-09-20

State v. Patrick Wolfe
parental rights subsequent to his conviction was a new factor warranting modification of his sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3548 - 2005-03-31

The North Bay Co. v. Washburn County Zoning Committee
the decision establishes a new principle of law; second, whether retrospective application will further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10052 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 97
A. Biegert of Doar Drill, S.C. of New Richmond. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32759 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
were new factors justifying sentence modification. Even assuming the information Orlebeke provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6697 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
not provided at the sentencing hearing constitutes a new factor warranting modification of the sentence; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27267 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
relief. She has not shown sufficient grounds to withdraw her plea or that a new factor warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36112 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 We conclude the court erroneously admitted this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24