Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11321 - 11330 of 50108 for our.
Search results 11321 - 11330 of 50108 for our.
State v. Rudolfo Briseno
substituting our judgment for the trier of fact unless the fact finder relied on evidence which was inherently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9408 - 2005-03-31
substituting our judgment for the trier of fact unless the fact finder relied on evidence which was inherently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9408 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Wisnefski, based on her income in 2003. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106658 - 2014-01-14
. Wisnefski, based on her income in 2003. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106658 - 2014-01-14
CA Blank Order
so. Upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18
so. Upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138018 - 2015-03-23
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138018 - 2015-03-23
State v. Marco A. Delatorre
of conviction. Appellate counsel has concluded and our review of the record confirms that Delatorre’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14676 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. Appellate counsel has concluded and our review of the record confirms that Delatorre’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14676 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry L. Cox
Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13643 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400917 - 2021-07-30
. was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400917 - 2021-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
provided at the plea hearing further supports our conclusion that an appellate challenge to the entry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399784 - 2021-07-28
provided at the plea hearing further supports our conclusion that an appellate challenge to the entry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399784 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133308 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133308 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s order placing her under a guardianship and protective placement. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138551 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s order placing her under a guardianship and protective placement. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138551 - 2017-09-21