Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11321 - 11330 of 50138 for our.
Search results 11321 - 11330 of 50138 for our.
State v. Ben F. Oldakowski
report pursuant to Rule 809.23, Stats. Oldakowski has not responded to the report. Upon our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31
report pursuant to Rule 809.23, Stats. Oldakowski has not responded to the report. Upon our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). We extend our deadline accordingly. Nos. 2021AP380-NM 2021AP381-NM 2 Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400521 - 2021-07-28
). We extend our deadline accordingly. Nos. 2021AP380-NM 2021AP381-NM 2 Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400521 - 2021-07-28
CA Blank Order
so. Upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18
so. Upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
State v. Jerry L. Anderson
of conviction. Our review of the record discloses that Anderson’s no contest guilty pleas were knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11462 - 2017-09-19
of conviction. Our review of the record discloses that Anderson’s no contest guilty pleas were knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11462 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Floyd E. Murphy
Wis.2d 240, 260, 432 N.W.2d 913, 921-22 (1988). Our review of that determination is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11959 - 2017-09-21
Wis.2d 240, 260, 432 N.W.2d 913, 921-22 (1988). Our review of that determination is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11959 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140294 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
withdrawal based on the ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364804 - 2021-05-12
withdrawal based on the ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364804 - 2021-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206744 - 2018-01-05
that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206744 - 2018-01-05
CA Blank Order
752, 734 N.W.2d 169. Our review of the trial transcripts persuades us that the State produced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143206 - 2015-06-23
752, 734 N.W.2d 169. Our review of the trial transcripts persuades us that the State produced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143206 - 2015-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there was no viable objection to make to the motion and therefore no merit to such a claim. In our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179174 - 2017-09-21
there was no viable objection to make to the motion and therefore no merit to such a claim. In our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179174 - 2017-09-21