Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11331 - 11340 of 98503 for court records search online.
Search results 11331 - 11340 of 98503 for court records search online.
State v. Carlos Z.T.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE March 30, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14628 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE March 30, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14628 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Z.T.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE March 30, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14628 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE March 30, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14628 - 2017-09-21
St. Croix County v. Adam Douglas Cress
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 17, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk, Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 17, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk, Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 3, 2009 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40355 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 3, 2009 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40355 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael V.P.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE August 24, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15463 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE August 24, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15463 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel P. Moen
, and there was evidence in the record to support more than one reasonable inference, an appellate court must accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4457 - 2017-09-19
, and there was evidence in the record to support more than one reasonable inference, an appellate court must accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4457 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jon P. Torok
has not made findings of fact regarding probable cause, this court reviews the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19449 - 2017-09-21
has not made findings of fact regarding probable cause, this court reviews the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19449 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jon P. Torok
regarding probable cause, this court reviews the record to determine whether probable cause existed. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19449 - 2005-08-29
regarding probable cause, this court reviews the record to determine whether probable cause existed. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19449 - 2005-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Dural Nicholson
. 1987). Based on the record, this court cannot conclude that the trial court's findings of fact were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8439 - 2017-09-19
. 1987). Based on the record, this court cannot conclude that the trial court's findings of fact were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8439 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dural Nicholson
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED July 5, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8439 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED July 5, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8439 - 2005-03-31