Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11331 - 11340 of 16104 for search.

COURT OF APPEALS
. In the circuit court, the Schiders argued that they had conducted an online search that established that Fannie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131889 - 2014-12-17

Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
). This court’s role is to search the record to locate credible evidence, which supports the commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7456 - 2005-03-31

State v. Krystal G. J.
, that ends our inquiry. We will not look beyond the plain language of a statute to search for other meanings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9323 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict. Id., ¶¶38-39. We will search the record for credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99612 - 2013-07-23

[PDF] North Central Companies, Inc. v. D & D Properties
conflicts, it is the trial court’s function to resolve the conflicts. Appellate courts search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2806 - 2017-09-19

City of Brookfield v. Daniel D. Ulmen
with the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, a law enforcement officer must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3624 - 2005-03-31

State v. John R. Jagusch
to maim Rasmussen six months later. The police arrested Jagusch after executing a search warrant for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11783 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Barney A. Guarnero v. Gerald A. Berge
. On December 12, 2000, a prison official seized papers belonging to Guarnero during a cell search. Among
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6544 - 2017-09-19

State v. Frank Starich
guarantee the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. State v. Gaulrapp, 207 Wis. 2d 598
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel Slaughter
(1964) (An appellate court need not sift through the record in search of facts to support an assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31