Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11331 - 11340 of 56373 for so.
Search results 11331 - 11340 of 56373 for so.
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
hardship, and so that the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done.” Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10761 - 2005-03-31
hardship, and so that the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done.” Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
positioned himself so he could see what was going on in the back and he could see Beth. Beth was directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239807 - 2019-04-30
positioned himself so he could see what was going on in the back and he could see Beth. Beth was directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239807 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
so that he may be resentenced before a different judge. Sprague argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20
so that he may be resentenced before a different judge. Sprague argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
is her mother? THE DEFENDANT: At work. THE COURT: So the mother works and you sit at home, right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35252 - 2009-03-04
is her mother? THE DEFENDANT: At work. THE COURT: So the mother works and you sit at home, right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35252 - 2009-03-04
[PDF]
Mark Heitman v. City of Mauston Common Council
an action for mandamus to require it to do so and for injunctive relief. Mauston answered, denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14725 - 2017-09-21
an action for mandamus to require it to do so and for injunctive relief. Mauston answered, denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 9
identical, so for ease of reading, we discuss them in the singular. Nos. 2020AP1244 2020AP1509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479733 - 2022-04-11
identical, so for ease of reading, we discuss them in the singular. Nos. 2020AP1244 2020AP1509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479733 - 2022-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and his vehicle fit the general No. 2021AP1362-CR 7 description. So I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671916 - 2023-06-27
and his vehicle fit the general No. 2021AP1362-CR 7 description. So I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671916 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
, e.g., Gibson v. Leonard, 32 N.E. 182, 183-84 (Ill. 1892); Kilpatrick v. Sklar, 548 So. 2d 215, 217
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21
, e.g., Gibson v. Leonard, 32 N.E. 182, 183-84 (Ill. 1892); Kilpatrick v. Sklar, 548 So. 2d 215, 217
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16629 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cedric Holze
.” However, Holze never really tells us why this is so. Without more, we are unable to properly discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31
.” However, Holze never really tells us why this is so. Without more, we are unable to properly discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to deportation. Q: So– A: I didn’t use the word “mandatory.” Q: I believe the word used was “potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116904 - 2017-09-21
to deportation. Q: So– A: I didn’t use the word “mandatory.” Q: I believe the word used was “potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116904 - 2017-09-21