Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11341 - 11350 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. “The defendant requesting resentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655640 - 2023-05-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law de novo. Id. “When the terms of a contract are plain and unambiguous, we will construe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158292 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). Whether a new factor exists is a question of law for de novo review. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305602 - 2020-11-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause to arrest presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kasian, 207 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83806 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Tara S.
a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5932 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
] is contrary to law is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.” Kaminski, 245 Wis. 2d 310, ¶22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
] is contrary to law is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.” Kaminski, 245 Wis. 2d 310, ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10

State v. Corey Lee Fondon
. Stat. § 971.12(1), which is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hamm, 146 Wis. 2d 130
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5098 - 2005-03-31

State v. John M. Ligon
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74 (1993). Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5008 - 2005-03-31

Suzanne Schuck v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
is a matter of contract interpretation and, therefore, a question of law that we review de novo. Williams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8885 - 2005-03-31