Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11351 - 11360 of 16507 for commentating.

State v. Adam Procell
, Stats. [1] After making this comment at the sentencing hearing, the trial court then proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11980 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
). Broecker also asserts, again without citing any authority, that the officer improperly commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28471 - 2007-03-20

[PDF] State v. James A. Sybers
was voluntarily made. Sybers bases this argument on his comments showing that he was reluctant to plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of the PSI comment when it stated that it “shares the sentiment expressed” by the PSI author. Schultz has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34572 - 2008-11-11

State v. Eileen M. Entringer
. Shea, 221 Wis. 2d 418, 429, 585 N.W.2d 662 (Ct. App. 1998), the Washington court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3057 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Martin D. Triplett
the scene of a bank robbery lifted the individual’s shirt when he detected a bulge; commenting that “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20168 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter A. Paget
did not directly comment on Paget's credibility. However, the referee acknowledged that the DOC log
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16552 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
601 (Ct. App. 1993) (“A prosecutor’s comment by questioning or argument about the shortcomings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211744 - 2018-04-25

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey A.M.
of record’” (citation omitted)). ¶10 Moreover, comment j to § 27 of the Restatement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7008 - 2005-03-31

Eric M. Schmitz v. Firstar Bank Milwaukee
behalf. While this may be true, it does not bear upon the question of Firstar’s liability. The comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4279 - 2005-03-31