Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11351 - 11360 of 58509 for speedy trial.

Cynthia A. Schultz v. Charles J. Sykes
. The trial court ultimately dismissed the action and awarded the defendants $168,944.97 in costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6296 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Norwood claims he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106032 - 2013-12-26

[PDF] State v. Darrel W. Howsden
of the charges, but not both; (2) the trial court erred by excluding the testimony of the defense expert witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9479 - 2017-09-19

State v. Darrel W. Howsden
of the charges, but not both; (2) the trial court erred by excluding the testimony of the defense expert witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9479 - 2005-03-31

State v. Chad D. Everts
a trial court order denying his motion for plea withdrawal. Everts argues that his plea was not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5473 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael T. Schmaling
of his sentence. Schmaling insists that the trial court erred when it ordered him to pay restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lynn G.
parental responsibility; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6919 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
for summary judgment. The trial court denied the motion without prejudice and the parties conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30603 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP588 2 After a jury trial in 1991, Downing was convicted of five felonies related to one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251503 - 2019-12-16

Commercial Industrial Services of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Frederick H. Grieshaber
. Milwaukee Precision argues that the following findings entered by the trial court are clearly erroneous: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9280 - 2005-03-31