Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11361 - 11370 of 80052 for 任何超越自己权限制定的————,都是不合法的,也是无效的。 A、 教育文献 B、 教育政策 C、 教育法律 D、 教育法规.

State v. Robert A. Mendoza
for Milwaukee County: Laurence C. Gram, Jr., Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12303 - 2005-03-31

State v. Larry A. Tollefson
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED September 25, 1997 NOTICE A party may file with t...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12564 - 2005-03-31

State v. James A. Smith
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Smith also claimed that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26318 - 2006-08-28

State v. David A. Plotkin
to § 941.20(1)(c), Stats. Plotkin seeks a new trial based on his contention that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9334 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lee A. Brown
for cause juror Phyllis C. Because Brown fails to show how any alleged deficient performance by his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10525 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lyle A. Greendeer
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The bailiff made other remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10293 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher A. Knapp
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The State argues that we should not review Knapp's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8162 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph A. Kayon
of party to a crime of burglary, pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.05(2)(b) (1999-2000).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4350 - 2005-03-31

State v. Darryl A. Harding
. He testified that he did so “[b]ased on the circumstance that there was a previous theft in Elm Grove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31

State v. Charles A. Dunlap
of evidence is a decision left to the discretion of the circuit court. See Michael R. B. v. State, 175 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15898 - 2005-03-31