Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11361 - 11370 of 50070 for our.
Search results 11361 - 11370 of 50070 for our.
State v. Steven T. Miller
. Miller has responded to the report. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
. Miller has responded to the report. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in denying his motion for a mistrial. Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2017AP704-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208326 - 2018-02-14
in denying his motion for a mistrial. Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2017AP704-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208326 - 2018-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241512 - 2019-05-30
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241512 - 2019-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
battery on a person. Arrowood was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
battery on a person. Arrowood was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to reopen a judgment on damages and an order denying reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154986 - 2017-09-21
motion to reopen a judgment on damages and an order denying reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154986 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and attorney’s fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141514 - 2017-09-21
and attorney’s fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=302138 - 2020-11-05
that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=302138 - 2020-11-05
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2013AP338-CRNM 2 our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97572 - 2014-09-15
Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2013AP338-CRNM 2 our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97572 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11
of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
Biersdorf & Associates v. Spire Capital Corporation
with local billing norms. Id. Therefore, “we do not substitute our judgment for the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7201 - 2017-09-20
with local billing norms. Id. Therefore, “we do not substitute our judgment for the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7201 - 2017-09-20