Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11361 - 11370 of 45800 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Richard W. Foelker
tests should have been suppressed on grounds that he was denied his statutory right to a urine test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31

State v. Caran K. Zastrow
when it found that her demand for a breath test was not a request for an alternative chemical test. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9538 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Caran K. Zastrow
for a breath test was not a request for an alternative chemical test. We affirm because the factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9538 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
free from all drugs, and to complete random urinalysis testing. The circuit court found that C. S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162333 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Steve A. Fleming
for an alternative test at his expense. We conclude the anonymous tip informing the Sauk County sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19851 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steve A. Fleming
for an alternative test at his expense. We conclude the anonymous tip informing the Sauk County sheriff’s department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19851 - 2005-10-05

[PDF] State v. Richard W. Foelker
) and a postconviction order denying relief. Foelker contends that the results of breath and blood tests should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10528 - 2017-09-20

State v. John B. Beiswenger
that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress the blood alcohol test results because the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6341 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
The State appeals an order suppressing the results of Robert Kroeplin’s blood test after he was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20

State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
, P.J.[1] The State appeals an order suppressing the results of Robert Kroeplin’s blood test after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2005-03-31