Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11391 - 11400 of 58532 for o j.
Search results 11391 - 11400 of 58532 for o j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that [n]o small part of the States’ [sic] case against Mr. Meade was the fact that at the end
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
that [n]o small part of the States’ [sic] case against Mr. Meade was the fact that at the end
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court for Marquette County: richard o. wright, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, P.J.[1] Randy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108721 - 2014-03-05
court for Marquette County: richard o. wright, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, P.J.[1] Randy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108721 - 2014-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). “[O]ur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
) that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). “[O]ur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
Babette Grunow v. The UWM Post
brief: “[t]o hold that [UWM] is not entitled to the protections of sovereign immunity ‘would be without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15231 - 2005-03-31
brief: “[t]o hold that [UWM] is not entitled to the protections of sovereign immunity ‘would be without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15231 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
” is not exactly that. The statement says that “[o]n April 95 through 2001, I mistakenly stated that Walter E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
” is not exactly that. The statement says that “[o]n April 95 through 2001, I mistakenly stated that Walter E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
(“[T]o establish that postconviction or appellate counsel was ineffective, a defendant bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89199 - 2012-11-13
(“[T]o establish that postconviction or appellate counsel was ineffective, a defendant bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89199 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rights is discretionary and the best interest of the child is the prevailing standard. Gerald O. v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075438 - 2026-02-06
rights is discretionary and the best interest of the child is the prevailing standard. Gerald O. v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075438 - 2026-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the State for the waiver, he answered “[n]o Your Honor, nothing that needs to be placed on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67344 - 2014-09-15
by the State for the waiver, he answered “[n]o Your Honor, nothing that needs to be placed on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67344 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
here: Contrary to Jevon’s implication … [n]o statute obligates a circuit court to place a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121736 - 2014-09-15
here: Contrary to Jevon’s implication … [n]o statute obligates a circuit court to place a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121736 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eric J.D.
because “[n]o fifteen year old person would have believed he was free to leave when the car in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13048 - 2005-03-31
because “[n]o fifteen year old person would have believed he was free to leave when the car in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13048 - 2005-03-31