Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11391 - 11400 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 11391 - 11400 of 58546 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
or services. She argues that she was denied constitutional due process in this way. The trial court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53665 - 2010-08-24
or services. She argues that she was denied constitutional due process in this way. The trial court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53665 - 2010-08-24
County of Walworth v. John J. Quinn
drunk driving. The issue in this appeal is limited to Quinn’s complaint that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3025 - 2005-03-31
drunk driving. The issue in this appeal is limited to Quinn’s complaint that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3025 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
of his sentence. Schmaling insists that the trial court erred when it ordered him to pay restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31
of his sentence. Schmaling insists that the trial court erred when it ordered him to pay restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Hicks
§§ 161.16(2)(b)1, 161.41(1)(cm)4, 939.32, and 939.05, Stats. On appeal, Hicks argues that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9369 - 2005-03-31
§§ 161.16(2)(b)1, 161.41(1)(cm)4, 939.32, and 939.05, Stats. On appeal, Hicks argues that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9369 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Anton
of trial counsel; and (2) he is entitled to a new trial because the investigating officer was permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10427 - 2017-09-20
of trial counsel; and (2) he is entitled to a new trial because the investigating officer was permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10427 - 2017-09-20
State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
an order denying his postconviction motion. Gray claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion. Gray claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mary K.
in 1990, and Kedar,[2] born in 1996. Mary K. contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18073 - 2005-05-19
in 1990, and Kedar,[2] born in 1996. Mary K. contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18073 - 2005-05-19
[PDF]
State v. Mary K.
, and Kedar, 2 born in 1996. Mary K. contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18073 - 2017-09-21
, and Kedar, 2 born in 1996. Mary K. contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18073 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven George Lillo
. The State is correct; therefore, we reverse and remand the matter to the trial court with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14209 - 2014-09-15
. The State is correct; therefore, we reverse and remand the matter to the trial court with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14209 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
render the testimony unreliable. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d at 421. Daniels faults his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131966 - 2017-09-21
render the testimony unreliable. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d at 421. Daniels faults his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131966 - 2017-09-21