Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 6309 for 208.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
without deference to the trial court. State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26971 - 2006-10-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
addressed the issue applying the standard for recantation testimony. See State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68324 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey L. Neuman
, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶5 We cannot resolve whether Waukesha County held Neuman in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4239 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
or Wisconsin Supreme Court opinions. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189-90, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138236 - 2015-03-18

Wisconsin Worker's Compensation Uninsured Employers Fund, v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of his injuries will permit.” Knobbe v. Industrial Comm’n, 208 Wis. 185, 190, 242 N.W. 501 (1932). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6112 - 2009-08-17

COURT OF APPEALS
is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.” State v. McCallum, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110014 - 2014-04-08

Armando Trevino v. Ladd & Milaeger
v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 190, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). By the Court.—Judgment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3972 - 2005-03-31

State v. James P.F.
. The application of law to undisputed facts is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12873 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on that basis. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189-90, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997) (only the supreme court has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165108 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 37
) the evidence is not merely cumulative.”6 Plude, 310 Wis. 2d 28, ¶32 (citing State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371382 - 2021-07-14