Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Beth E. Hammond v. Dennis W. Hammond
agreed to joint legal custody of the minor child and shared physical placement. They further agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14665 - 2017-09-21
agreed to joint legal custody of the minor child and shared physical placement. They further agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14665 - 2017-09-21
Beth E. Hammond v. Dennis W. Hammond
. The parties agreed to joint legal custody of the minor child and shared physical placement. They further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14665 - 2005-03-31
. The parties agreed to joint legal custody of the minor child and shared physical placement. They further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Andrea L. Propper v. Ryan T. Propper
on June 21, 2001. A hearing was scheduled for December 9, 2002, to resolve custody of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24543 - 2017-09-21
on June 21, 2001. A hearing was scheduled for December 9, 2002, to resolve custody of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24543 - 2017-09-21
Andrea L. Propper v. Ryan T. Propper
, 2002, to resolve custody of the parties’ children, physical placement, and other issues. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24543 - 2006-03-21
, 2002, to resolve custody of the parties’ children, physical placement, and other issues. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24543 - 2006-03-21
[PDF]
Mae Neugart v. Lori Bell
(collectively, “the objectors”), sought to prove the accounts were joint accounts of convenience, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20562 - 2017-09-21
(collectively, “the objectors”), sought to prove the accounts were joint accounts of convenience, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20562 - 2017-09-21
Mae Neugart v. Lori Bell
of Christopherson (collectively, “the objectors”), sought to prove the accounts were joint accounts of convenience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20562 - 2005-12-07
of Christopherson (collectively, “the objectors”), sought to prove the accounts were joint accounts of convenience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20562 - 2005-12-07
[PDF]
WI APP 104
argues that the trial court wrongfully denied his motion to suppress the blood test results because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85613 - 2014-09-15
argues that the trial court wrongfully denied his motion to suppress the blood test results because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85613 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
count of burglary of a building. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
count of burglary of a building. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
Karen M. Polakowski v. John R. Polakowski
HOOVER, P.J. John Polakowski appeals an order denying his motion to enforce a stipulation for revision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5494 - 2005-03-31
HOOVER, P.J. John Polakowski appeals an order denying his motion to enforce a stipulation for revision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karen M. Polakowski v. John R. Polakowski
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. John Polakowski appeals an order denying his motion to enforce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5494 - 2017-09-19
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. John Polakowski appeals an order denying his motion to enforce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5494 - 2017-09-19