Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 83284 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting Julian Thomas’s motion to suppress evidence collected during a search of Thomas’s living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216144 - 2018-07-26
granting Julian Thomas’s motion to suppress evidence collected during a search of Thomas’s living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216144 - 2018-07-26
State v. James E. Janssen
court erred when it declined to suppress both the fruits of search warrants as well as his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
court erred when it declined to suppress both the fruits of search warrants as well as his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Mendoza
of the tavern, or the search of the car parked outside of the tavern. Therefore, upon remand, if the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12303 - 2017-09-21
of the tavern, or the search of the car parked outside of the tavern. Therefore, upon remand, if the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12303 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert A. Mendoza
). In this case, the officers’ search of the tavern was a warrantless administrative inspection authorized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12303 - 2005-03-31
). In this case, the officers’ search of the tavern was a warrantless administrative inspection authorized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12303 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows: WHEREAS, Eric Essinger has this day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15
. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows: WHEREAS, Eric Essinger has this day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Id. at 336. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84134 - 2012-07-02
we review de novo. Id. at 336. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84134 - 2012-07-02
Frontsheet
question in this case is whether the officers' search of Artic's upstairs residence was also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52199 - 2010-07-14
question in this case is whether the officers' search of Artic's upstairs residence was also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52199 - 2010-07-14
[PDF]
State v. James E. Thomas
, and that they were going to search his car. Thomas responded that the police could go ahead and search his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14398 - 2014-09-15
, and that they were going to search his car. Thomas responded that the police could go ahead and search his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14398 - 2014-09-15
State v. James E. Thomas
, and that they were going to search his car. Thomas responded that the police could go ahead and search his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14398 - 2005-03-31
, and that they were going to search his car. Thomas responded that the police could go ahead and search his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14398 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. In that case, the warrant was searching for specific stolen items, but described those items using very generic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27
. In that case, the warrant was searching for specific stolen items, but described those items using very generic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27