Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 30172 for de.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 30172 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 Standard of Review. ¶11 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177449 - 2017-09-21
6 Standard of Review. ¶11 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177449 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to modify support. ¶4 Martin moved for a hearing de novo. Martin requested that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142086 - 2015-05-20
to modify support. ¶4 Martin moved for a hearing de novo. Martin requested that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142086 - 2015-05-20
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then addressed Essa’s request to modify maintenance. Essa argued that Mary was in a de facto marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185952 - 2017-09-21
then addressed Essa’s request to modify maintenance. Essa argued that Mary was in a de facto marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). This court’s “standard of review on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767943 - 2024-02-22
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). This court’s “standard of review on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767943 - 2024-02-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for de novo review of the family court commissioner’s decision. In support of that motion, he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292220 - 2020-09-29
for de novo review of the family court commissioner’s decision. In support of that motion, he filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292220 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
State v. Demarrus D. Willis
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Bollig
Standard of Review. A court’s competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21
Standard of Review. A court’s competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Tamara G. Hernandez v. Randolph S. Allen
in this case, Randolph did not seek de novo circuit court review of this ruling.7 See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21
in this case, Randolph did not seek de novo circuit court review of this ruling.7 See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard L. Bollig
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31