Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 30059 for de.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 30059 for de.
SCS of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Milwaukee County
, including the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal matter that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2607 - 2005-03-31
, including the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal matter that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2607 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 65
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81713 - 2014-09-15
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81713 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Johnson
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review. The Halls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144403 - 2015-07-13
certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review. The Halls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144403 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to obtain certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
to obtain certiorari review of the Review Board’s decision, this time the Halls sought de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard L. Bollig
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12828 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse Professional Police Association v. City of LaCrosse
, 236 N.W.2d at 234-35. Rather, the court proceeded directly to a de novo consideration of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11472 - 2005-03-31
, 236 N.W.2d at 234-35. Rather, the court proceeded directly to a de novo consideration of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Bollig
Standard of Review. A court’s competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21
Standard of Review. A court’s competency to act is a question of law which we review de novo. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Demarrus D. Willis
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11904 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Tamara G. Hernandez v. Randolph S. Allen
in this case, Randolph did not seek de novo circuit court review of this ruling.7 See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21
in this case, Randolph did not seek de novo circuit court review of this ruling.7 See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19917 - 2017-09-21