Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 6481 for dr.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 6481 for dr.
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Isbell
was revoked and he was sent to Dodge Correctional Institution to await sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8185 - 2017-09-19
was revoked and he was sent to Dodge Correctional Institution to await sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8185 - 2017-09-19
State v. Henry F. Pocan
findings are supported by the testimony of Dr. Howard Porter, a clinical psychologist employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13875 - 2005-03-31
findings are supported by the testimony of Dr. Howard Porter, a clinical psychologist employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13875 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, as defined in Wis. Stat. § 948.07(1)). The State then presented the testimony of two psychologists, Dr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18
, as defined in Wis. Stat. § 948.07(1)). The State then presented the testimony of two psychologists, Dr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
State v. Henry F. Pocan
court’s findings are supported by the testimony of Dr. Howard Porter, a clinical psychologist employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13875 - 2014-09-15
court’s findings are supported by the testimony of Dr. Howard Porter, a clinical psychologist employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13875 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
) whether Dr. Matthew Lindemann (Lindemann) was a borrowed employee of St. Joseph's Hospital of Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37485 - 2009-07-09
) whether Dr. Matthew Lindemann (Lindemann) was a borrowed employee of St. Joseph's Hospital of Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37485 - 2009-07-09
Pamela R. Obey v. Thomas J. Halloin, M.D.
alleged that Noah suffered brain damage as a consequence of Dr. Halloin's negligence at the time of Noah's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17510 - 2005-03-31
alleged that Noah suffered brain damage as a consequence of Dr. Halloin's negligence at the time of Noah's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17510 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Pamela R. Obey v. Thomas J. Halloin, M.D.
as a consequence of Dr. Halloin's negligence at the time of Noah's delivery. ¶4 The complaint was filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17510 - 2017-09-21
as a consequence of Dr. Halloin's negligence at the time of Noah's delivery. ¶4 The complaint was filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17510 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony from Dr. Engen—the court-appointed psychologist—who made the following diagnoses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499082 - 2022-03-24
testimony from Dr. Engen—the court-appointed psychologist—who made the following diagnoses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499082 - 2022-03-24
[PDF]
Noah Filppula-McArthur v. Thomas Halloin, M.D.
as a consequence of Dr. Halloin's negligence at the time of Noah's delivery. ¶4 The complaint was filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17496 - 2017-09-21
as a consequence of Dr. Halloin's negligence at the time of Noah's delivery. ¶4 The complaint was filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17496 - 2017-09-21
Noah Filppula-McArthur v. Thomas Halloin, M.D.
alleged that Noah suffered brain damage as a consequence of Dr. Halloin's negligence at the time of Noah's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17496 - 2005-03-31
alleged that Noah suffered brain damage as a consequence of Dr. Halloin's negligence at the time of Noah's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17496 - 2005-03-31