Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 3429 for y's.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
rejected this argument as well, labeling it “[s]omewhat contradictor[y]” given his argument that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03

COURT OF APPEALS
you want, but not saying that number, if that makes sense. …. … [Y]ou don’t want to say numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09

State v. Jacquelyn A. LoPiccolo
saying anything. LoPiccolo followed him, telling Vanessa on the way out, “[Y]ou happy? He’s dead now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20008 - 2005-10-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Any changes imposed by 2005 Wis. Act 437 “first appl[y] to violations committed on the effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73446 - 2011-11-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
each of the elements of the Continuing CHIPS ground and asked D.B.: [Y]ou are not agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174279 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at the restitution hearing as part of his or her sentencing. However, Ramczyk is plainly a “part[y] interested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, but Daniels refused, saying “[y]ou won’t find it.” Daniels was arrested for obstruction. The police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26

State v. Margaret C.
interest. See State v. Joseph P., 200 Wis.2d 227, 241, 546 N.W.2d 494, 500 (Ct. App. 1996) (“heav[]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31

State v. Douglas Wolff
retire to the jury room. The supplementary instruction reads: [Y]ou jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10701 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mario M. Martinez
violations of the law,” and “[y]ou were repeatedly dishonest.” The court looked at Martinez’s character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2751 - 2005-03-31