Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 3429 for y's.
Search results 1141 - 1150 of 3429 for y's.
COURT OF APPEALS
to proceed today, to represent yourself at the sentencing hearing?” Adell responded, “[y]es, it is.” Adell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33655 - 2008-08-11
to proceed today, to represent yourself at the sentencing hearing?” Adell responded, “[y]es, it is.” Adell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33655 - 2008-08-11
State v. Craig P. Helgeland
on in the sentencing proceedings, the trial court stated, “[Y]ou can argue, but I won’t probably deviate from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31
on in the sentencing proceedings, the trial court stated, “[Y]ou can argue, but I won’t probably deviate from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
S. Spring St. Port Washington, WI 53074-0994 Adam Y. Gerol District Attorney P.O. Box 994
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169792 - 2017-09-21
S. Spring St. Port Washington, WI 53074-0994 Adam Y. Gerol District Attorney P.O. Box 994
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169792 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
…. [B]y signing this agreement, client agrees to waive … rights to alternate forums and submits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89340 - 2012-11-13
…. [B]y signing this agreement, client agrees to waive … rights to alternate forums and submits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89340 - 2012-11-13
City of Milwaukee v. B. Davis Investment, LLC
to Davis, “[Y]ou’re correct, they can’t just go on property unless they have either an inspection warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
to Davis, “[Y]ou’re correct, they can’t just go on property unless they have either an inspection warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
later someone says—well, witness X or witness Y should have been called and why No. 2019AP9-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371961 - 2021-09-13
later someone says—well, witness X or witness Y should have been called and why No. 2019AP9-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371961 - 2021-09-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to exit and walk to the back of his vehicle. Peterson then said: “[Y]ou got something on your nose
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357946 - 2021-04-20
to exit and walk to the back of his vehicle. Peterson then said: “[Y]ou got something on your nose
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357946 - 2021-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Any changes imposed by 2005 Wis. Act 437 “first appl[y] to violations committed on the effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73446 - 2011-11-07
Any changes imposed by 2005 Wis. Act 437 “first appl[y] to violations committed on the effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73446 - 2011-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rejected this argument as well, labeling it “[s]omewhat contradictor[y]” given his argument that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03
rejected this argument as well, labeling it “[s]omewhat contradictor[y]” given his argument that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03
State v. Jacquelyn A. LoPiccolo
saying anything. LoPiccolo followed him, telling Vanessa on the way out, “[Y]ou happy? He’s dead now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20008 - 2005-10-19
saying anything. LoPiccolo followed him, telling Vanessa on the way out, “[Y]ou happy? He’s dead now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20008 - 2005-10-19