Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11401 - 11410 of 58492 for speedy trial.

Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
and the answer was appropriate. On cross appeal, the respondents contend that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2009-08-17

State v. Andrew D. Wielunski
by relying solely on his income tax returns to determine that he was an Illinois resident; and (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14794 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Edward M. Moran v. Lakeview Investments
The trial court held one hearing on all three contracts and, after hearing the evidence presented by Moran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7404 - 2017-09-20

State v. Anthony Hicks
§§ 161.16(2)(b)1, 161.41(1)(cm)4, 939.32, and 939.05, Stats. On appeal, Hicks argues that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9369 - 2005-03-31

State v. Teng Vang
, the van’s occupants all identified Vang as the shooter—and he knew that if he went to trial and testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21456 - 2006-02-21

Frank X. Kinast v. Dennis R. Barry
Kinast appeal a judgment dismissing their quiet title action against Dennis and Dorothy Barry. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10413 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jamie Goodrum
to § 974.06, Stats. The motion alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to preserve issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12615 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas M. Schottler
convicting him of first-degree reckless injury and aggravated battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5794 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Peter J. Whiteman v. Kim M. Epps
of visitation rights with their child. The matter went to trial, and the jury found that Epps had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8320 - 2017-09-19

State v. La'Shone Jackson
his request for a continuance on the day of trial. We affirm. ¶2 Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2941 - 2005-03-31