Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11411 - 11420 of 63388 for Motion for joint custody.

State v. Daniel Hoyt
the trial court should have granted Hoyt's mistrial motion. We agree with counsel's description, analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8116 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his motion for resentencing. Jackson argues that the trial court erred by imposing sentence without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21

Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
, and amounts distributable from various trusts or custodial funds. Similarly, in the context of an application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assault of a child under the age of thirteen, and an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727904 - 2023-11-14

State v. Daniel Anderson
filed a motion for post-conviction relief, arguing that convictions on two counts of bail jumping were
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17083 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel Anderson
jumping. (1) Whoever, having been released from custody under ch. 969, intentionally fails to comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17083 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel Anderson
jumping. (1) Whoever, having been released from custody under ch. 969, intentionally fails to comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17082 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, but chooses not to.” ¶11 As to Gray, the trial court granted the State’s motion, ruling that: Mr. Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30943 - 2007-11-26

[PDF] NOTICE
the State’s motion, ruling that: Mr. Gray will be allowed to testify based upon things that he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15

State v. Daniel Anderson
filed a motion for post-conviction relief, arguing that convictions on two counts of bail jumping were
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17082 - 2005-03-31