Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11411 - 11420 of 50100 for our.
Search results 11411 - 11420 of 50100 for our.
CA Blank Order
sufficient grounds for avoiding the procedural bar. Upon our review of the parties’ briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143349 - 2015-06-17
sufficient grounds for avoiding the procedural bar. Upon our review of the parties’ briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143349 - 2015-06-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
based on a new factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887340 - 2024-12-11
based on a new factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887340 - 2024-12-11
[PDF]
Biersdorf & Associates v. Spire Capital Corporation
with local billing norms. Id. Therefore, “we do not substitute our judgment for the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7201 - 2017-09-20
with local billing norms. Id. Therefore, “we do not substitute our judgment for the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7201 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). We extend our deadline accordingly. Nos. 2021AP380-NM 2021AP381-NM 2 Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400508 - 2021-07-28
). We extend our deadline accordingly. Nos. 2021AP380-NM 2021AP381-NM 2 Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=400508 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion to withdraw his no-contest plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190170 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion to withdraw his no-contest plea. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190170 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether there exists any issue of arguable merit germane to the plea taking. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174207 - 2017-09-21
whether there exists any issue of arguable merit germane to the plea taking. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174207 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108310 - 2017-09-21
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240185 - 2019-05-07
to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240185 - 2019-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
provided at the plea hearing further supports our conclusion that an appellate challenge to the entry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399784 - 2021-07-28
provided at the plea hearing further supports our conclusion that an appellate challenge to the entry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399784 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Leporld L. Miller
being called but after the swearing in of the jury.” The State agrees that our decision in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8511 - 2017-09-19
being called but after the swearing in of the jury.” The State agrees that our decision in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8511 - 2017-09-19