Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11411 - 11420 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 11411 - 11420 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court to exercise our discretionary power of reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46374 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court to exercise our discretionary power of reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46374 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Stephanie Roberts v. Robby Joseph Roberts
, the court precluded Robby from submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
, the court precluded Robby from submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert L. Hartzell v. Paulette Hartzell
. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state in writing why its No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9304 - 2017-09-19
. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state in writing why its No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9304 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
(2007-08),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46374 - 2010-01-27
(2007-08),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46374 - 2010-01-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
of WIS. STAT. § 946.49(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15
of WIS. STAT. § 946.49(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15
Stephanie Roberts v. Robby Joseph Roberts
submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7568 - 2005-03-31
submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Reginald D. Moore
-0732-CR 00-1270-CR 2 modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2396 - 2017-09-19
-0732-CR 00-1270-CR 2 modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2396 - 2017-09-19
State v. William W. Bair
FINE, J. William W. Bair appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order denying him work-release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2833 - 2005-03-31
FINE, J. William W. Bair appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order denying him work-release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2833 - 2005-03-31
Ed Cody, Jr. v. Michael Weygandt
requiring trial. We conclude the trial court acted within its discretion when refusing to allow withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20084 - 2005-10-26
requiring trial. We conclude the trial court acted within its discretion when refusing to allow withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20084 - 2005-10-26
State v. Reginald D. Moore
from the order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2396 - 2005-03-31
from the order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2396 - 2005-03-31