Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 69156 for he.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 69156 for he.
State v. Bryant E. Carter
to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(3m) and 947.01 (1999-2000).[1] He raises three issues: (1) whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4960 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(3m) and 947.01 (1999-2000).[1] He raises three issues: (1) whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4960 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel T. Van Ornum
)(a) and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence of the violation. He contends that his stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16090 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and from an order denying his motion to suppress evidence of the violation. He contends that his stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16090 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to WIS. STAT. §§ 813.12(4), (8)(a), and 939.62(1)(a). He argues that the trial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042669 - 2025-11-26
to WIS. STAT. §§ 813.12(4), (8)(a), and 939.62(1)(a). He argues that the trial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042669 - 2025-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 Thames contends that he was denied due process, the right to self-representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157115 - 2017-09-21
. 1 Thames contends that he was denied due process, the right to self-representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157115 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
forty grams, with intent to deliver and use of a dangerous weapon. He also appeals a postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121607 - 2014-09-09
forty grams, with intent to deliver and use of a dangerous weapon. He also appeals a postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121607 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
State v. William James, Jr.
denying his motion for a new trial based on an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel challenge. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8472 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for a new trial based on an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel challenge. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8472 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark Alan Szarkowitz
challenged the validity of a repeater enhancement to his sentence. He did not address this issue in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6163 - 2005-03-31
challenged the validity of a repeater enhancement to his sentence. He did not address this issue in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6163 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
in 1983. He subsequently served time in mental health facilities and prison for violent acts related
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103550 - 2013-10-23
in 1983. He subsequently served time in mental health facilities and prison for violent acts related
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103550 - 2013-10-23
CA Blank Order
sentence modification. He also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111763 - 2014-05-01
sentence modification. He also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111763 - 2014-05-01
[PDF]
Dennis Earl Barnes v. Sauk County
medical care while he was an inmate in the Sauk County Jail and thereby violated the Eighth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25621 - 2017-09-21
medical care while he was an inmate in the Sauk County Jail and thereby violated the Eighth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25621 - 2017-09-21