Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 50147 for our.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 50147 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138475 - 2017-09-21
following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680426 - 2023-07-19
upon our review of the 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680426 - 2023-07-19
COURT OF APPEALS
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108310 - 2014-02-24
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108310 - 2014-02-24
CA Blank Order
of Stanchfield’s pleas. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire, waiver of rights form, and plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
of Stanchfield’s pleas. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire, waiver of rights form, and plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
is inherently or patently incredible will we substitute our judgment for that of the factfinder.” Ibid. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71379 - 2011-09-26
is inherently or patently incredible will we substitute our judgment for that of the factfinder.” Ibid. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71379 - 2011-09-26
State v. Edward L. Wilson
is insufficient to undermine our confidence in the outcome of the trial. In other words, these facts, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15642 - 2005-03-31
is insufficient to undermine our confidence in the outcome of the trial. In other words, these facts, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15642 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Institution. Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109467 - 2014-03-19
Institution. Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109467 - 2014-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806865 - 2024-05-31
support. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806865 - 2024-05-31
Town of Eldorado v. Harry Schmitz, Jr.
that our review of this issue is de novo because it involves an issue of constitutional law. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5105 - 2005-03-31
that our review of this issue is de novo because it involves an issue of constitutional law. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP939-CRNM 3 Counsel’s no-merit report does not address the plea colloquy.3 Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303576 - 2020-11-11
. No. 2019AP939-CRNM 3 Counsel’s no-merit report does not address the plea colloquy.3 Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303576 - 2020-11-11