Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 63721 for records/1000.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 63721 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194323 - 2017-09-21
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194323 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231305 - 2018-12-26
and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231305 - 2018-12-26
CA Blank Order
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131858 - 2014-12-14
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131858 - 2014-12-14
CA Blank Order
, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113543 - 2014-06-03
, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113543 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868944 - 2024-10-29
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868944 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868944 - 2024-10-29
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868944 - 2024-10-29
State v. Carl J. Knapp
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian W. Shaw
rely in part on the record of the first sentencing hearing. See State v. Martin, 121 Wis.2d 670, 688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
rely in part on the record of the first sentencing hearing. See State v. Martin, 121 Wis.2d 670, 688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144507 - 2015-07-12
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144507 - 2015-07-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138821 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138821 - 2017-09-21