Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 77125 for search which.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
breath test, which showed Reierson had a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .16. Reierson was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63282 - 2011-04-27

Lloyd Stunkel v. Price Electric Cooperative
was established in this case. The legal basis for a nuisance claim presents a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14545 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Keith A. Glass
and ordered him to lie on the pavement. The victim replied, “No problem,” to which the second robber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4323 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
off. LaDoux stated that Paul was “all fucked up,” which Morland took to mean intoxicated. LaDoux
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13

State v. Keith A. Glass
of his hand and ordered him to lie on the pavement. The victim replied, “No problem,” to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4323 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
.” ¶4 Albrecht then asked Liebhauser to exit his vehicle, which Liebhauser did with some difficulty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34114 - 2014-09-15

Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Bor-Mor, Inc.
the years. ¶3 Karban became interested in purchasing a boring machine, which can lay cable or wiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6686 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in a search incident to the arrest. In an interview with police, Love acknowledged pushing G.L.J
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744965 - 2023-12-27

[PDF] Winnebago County v. Kurt J. K.
on February 5, 2001. Kurt filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied. Kurt appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3620 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lloyd Stunkel v. Price Electric Cooperative
presents a question of law which this court resolves without deference to the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14545 - 2017-09-21