Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 58542 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30943 - 2007-11-26
(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30943 - 2007-11-26
Robert L. Hartzell v. Paulette Hartzell
, and granting joint legal custody. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9304 - 2005-03-31
, and granting joint legal custody. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stephanie Roberts v. Robby Joseph Roberts
, the court precluded Robby from submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
, the court precluded Robby from submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of WIS. STAT. ยง 946.49(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15
of WIS. STAT. ยง 946.49(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert L. Hartzell v. Paulette Hartzell
. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state in writing why its No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9304 - 2017-09-19
. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state in writing why its No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9304 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
(2007-08),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46374 - 2010-01-27
(2007-08),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46374 - 2010-01-27
State v. Reginald D. Moore
from the order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2396 - 2005-03-31
from the order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2396 - 2005-03-31
State v. John M. Albrecht
for robbery by use of force, as a party to the crime, having had a trial by jury and received a six-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11572 - 2005-03-31
for robbery by use of force, as a party to the crime, having had a trial by jury and received a six-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Reginald D. Moore
-0732-CR 00-1270-CR 2 modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2588 - 2017-09-19
-0732-CR 00-1270-CR 2 modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2588 - 2017-09-19
State v. David W. Kalk
, Stats. Just before his jury trial, Kalk moved for and received an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10979 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. Just before his jury trial, Kalk moved for and received an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10979 - 2005-03-31