Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 11421 - 11430 of 58542 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30943 - 2007-11-26
(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30943 - 2007-11-26
Robert L. Hartzell v. Paulette Hartzell
, and granting joint legal custody. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9304 - 2005-03-31
, and granting joint legal custody. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stephanie Roberts v. Robby Joseph Roberts
, the court precluded Robby from submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
, the court precluded Robby from submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of WIS. STAT. ยง 946.49(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15
of WIS. STAT. ยง 946.49(1)(a). Because we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(2007-08),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46374 - 2010-01-27
(2007-08),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46374 - 2010-01-27
[PDF]
Robert L. Hartzell v. Paulette Hartzell
. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state in writing why its No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9304 - 2017-09-19
. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state in writing why its No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9304 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles F. G.
argues the trial court erred by: (1) admitting statements the child made to a day-care teacher; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5620 - 2005-03-31
argues the trial court erred by: (1) admitting statements the child made to a day-care teacher; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5620 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rock K. Ingram
maintains that the trial court should have excluded the testimony from his parole agent and the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9882 - 2005-03-31
maintains that the trial court should have excluded the testimony from his parole agent and the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9882 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Zachary Rainer face down on the curb in front of 2869 North 12th Street; at trial, this address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338276 - 2021-02-23
Zachary Rainer face down on the curb in front of 2869 North 12th Street; at trial, this address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338276 - 2021-02-23
[PDF]
Nauga, Inc. v. Westel Milwaukee Company, Inc.
. SCHUDSON, J. Nauga, Inc., d/b/a Communication Connection (Nauga), appeals from the trial court judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10015 - 2017-09-19
. SCHUDSON, J. Nauga, Inc., d/b/a Communication Connection (Nauga), appeals from the trial court judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10015 - 2017-09-19