Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11431 - 11440 of 30164 for de.
Search results 11431 - 11440 of 30164 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standard.). The circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49875 - 2014-09-15
de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standard.). The circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the constitutionality of Wisconsin’s OWI statutory sentencing scheme calls for de novo review of the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86779 - 2014-09-15
to the constitutionality of Wisconsin’s OWI statutory sentencing scheme calls for de novo review of the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86779 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49213 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49213 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9, 16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W.2d 920
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218971 - 2018-09-12
de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9, 16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W.2d 920
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218971 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.1 Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40576 - 2014-09-15
court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.1 Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40576 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de novo based on the circuit court’s factual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444660 - 2021-10-26
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de novo based on the circuit court’s factual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444660 - 2021-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Van Ornum
N.W.2d 830 (1990). We review the trial court’s conclusion of constitutional reasonableness de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16090 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 830 (1990). We review the trial court’s conclusion of constitutional reasonableness de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16090 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie M.
on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.”). We review de novo whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4931 - 2017-09-19
on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.”). We review de novo whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
. Crowley v. Knapp, 94 Wis. 2d 421, 429-30, 288 N.W.2d 815 (1980). We review matters of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4989 - 2017-09-19
. Crowley v. Knapp, 94 Wis. 2d 421, 429-30, 288 N.W.2d 815 (1980). We review matters of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4989 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Bill A. Wells v. Tonya Partee
). However, we are not bound by a trial court’s conclusions of law, which we review de novo. See First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2330 - 2017-09-19
). However, we are not bound by a trial court’s conclusions of law, which we review de novo. See First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2330 - 2017-09-19