Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11431 - 11440 of 50107 for our.
Search results 11431 - 11440 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Carl G. Brosinski
to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court. No. 95-1331-CR -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9050 - 2017-09-19
to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court. No. 95-1331-CR -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9050 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, M.C. and S.C. R.D. was advised of her right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212739 - 2018-05-11
, M.C. and S.C. R.D. was advised of her right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212739 - 2018-05-11
Urban A. Hubert, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
presented to the adjustment committee. Van Ermen, 84 Wis.2d at 64, 267 N.W.2d at 20. Our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12157 - 2005-03-31
presented to the adjustment committee. Van Ermen, 84 Wis.2d at 64, 267 N.W.2d at 20. Our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12157 - 2005-03-31
Troy R. Gainer v. Paulette J. Lockwood
was frivolous and that this constituted a dismissal within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 801.02(7)(d). Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15566 - 2005-03-31
was frivolous and that this constituted a dismissal within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 801.02(7)(d). Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15566 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals from an April 24, 2025 order denying his motion for reconsideration. At issue is our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077632 - 2026-02-18
, appeals from an April 24, 2025 order denying his motion for reconsideration. At issue is our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077632 - 2026-02-18
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138018 - 2015-03-23
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138018 - 2015-03-23
CA Blank Order
, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978). Our review is limited to the trial court’s sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101901 - 2013-09-17
, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978). Our review is limited to the trial court’s sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101901 - 2013-09-17
CA Blank Order
. Wisnefski, based on her income in 2003. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106658 - 2014-01-14
. Wisnefski, based on her income in 2003. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106658 - 2014-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108310 - 2014-02-24
“clearly indicates that our supreme court meant the sentencing court which imposed the sentence under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108310 - 2014-02-24
State v. Jerry L. Cox
Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13642 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13642 - 2005-03-31