Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11431 - 11440 of 15310 for probate.

CA Blank Order
Courthouse 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016 Ericka Nelson Register in Probate St. Croix County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92442 - 2013-01-31

[PDF] Carol J. Apyan v. George H. Easton
to Attorney George H. Easton for his work on the probate estate of her late father. We affirm. ¶2 Sarkis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26203 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
Denny on probation with conditions that he spend 125 days in the county jail, maintain absolute sobriety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138107 - 2015-03-23

COURT OF APPEALS
, investigating officers did not make contact with him until March 4, 2005, after he was jailed on a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42482 - 2009-10-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for three years’ probation, consecutive to Count 3 and to the revocation sentence he then was serving
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245881 - 2019-09-04

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
probation with a condition that he serve sixty days in the county jail. Discussion ¶8 In reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27505 - 2006-12-18

Douglas H. Mellum v. Catherine Ann Mellum
enticement and placed on probation for ten years with a condition of one year in jail. The legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21432 - 2006-02-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the burglary. The court appropriately concluded that probation would unduly depreciate the seriousness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132561 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
failure on probation, and the need to protect the public. State v. Ziegler, 2006 WI App 49, ¶23, 289
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98494 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to the probation dispositions received by McBride and Schreindl. See State v. Giebel, 198 Wis. 2d 207, 220-21, 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95261 - 2013-04-10