Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11441 - 11450 of 83976 for simple case search.
Search results 11441 - 11450 of 83976 for simple case search.
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15952 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15952 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15953 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15956 - 2007-01-29
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15956 - 2007-01-29
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15955 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is “not based on simple harm to the opposing party’s case,” but rather whether the evidence “tend[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176623 - 2017-09-21
is “not based on simple harm to the opposing party’s case,” but rather whether the evidence “tend[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176623 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and McMorris was arrested after he failed to comply with the officer’s request to allow a pat-down search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107628 - 2017-09-21
and McMorris was arrested after he failed to comply with the officer’s request to allow a pat-down search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107628 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of individuals to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. CONST. amend. IV; WIS. CONST. art. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213537 - 2018-05-30
of individuals to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. CONST. amend. IV; WIS. CONST. art. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213537 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Sturm
and the officer therefore violated Sturm’s right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
and the officer therefore violated Sturm’s right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Rita A. Whitish
and searched her car. The car was full of many articles including two dresser drawers full of papers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9087 - 2017-09-19
and searched her car. The car was full of many articles including two dresser drawers full of papers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9087 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. CONST. amend. IV. In Terry v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27131 - 2014-09-15
The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. CONST. amend. IV. In Terry v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27131 - 2014-09-15