Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11441 - 11450 of 58492 for speedy trial.

Harold E. Taves v. Michael T. Sullivan
. PER CURIAM. Harold Taves appeals a trial court order that denied his petition for a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12968 - 2005-03-31

State v. John M. Albrecht
for robbery by use of force, as a party to the crime, having had a trial by jury and received a six-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11572 - 2005-03-31

State v. William W. Bair
FINE, J. William W. Bair appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order denying him work-release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2833 - 2005-03-31

Ed Cody, Jr. v. Michael Weygandt
requiring trial. We conclude the trial court acted within its discretion when refusing to allow withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20084 - 2005-10-26

[PDF] Strasser & Yde v. Joel Larson
and was incompetent when she executed the will. Hogue and Yde defended the allegations at trial. At the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2682 - 2017-09-19

National Exchange Bank & Trust v. Southside Tire Co., Inc.
collateral. We disagree with these contentions and affirm the judgment of the trial court. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5118 - 2005-03-31

State v. Reginald D. Moore
from the order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2396 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sharon McBride
, as party to the crime, contrary to §§ 940.19(1) and 939.05, STATS. She claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9102 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David W. Kalk
, § 947.01, STATS. Just before his jury trial, Kalk moved for and received an order discharging his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10979 - 2017-09-19

O.T. Lupinski v. City of Glendale Community Development Authority
the trial court’s judgment dismissing his action brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 32.05 (1997-98).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15838 - 2005-03-31