Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11441 - 11450 of 20897 for word.
Search results 11441 - 11450 of 20897 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
words. State v. Thomas, 2000 WI 13, ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. The statements of defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30960 - 2007-11-27
words. State v. Thomas, 2000 WI 13, ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. The statements of defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30960 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
WI APP 60
318. As a part of that interpretation, we will apply the plain meaning of the words in the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32131 - 2014-09-15
318. As a part of that interpretation, we will apply the plain meaning of the words in the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32131 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
law.” State v. Robinson, 145 Wis. 2d 273, 281, 426 N.W.2d 606 (Ct. App. 1988). In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191583 - 2017-09-21
law.” State v. Robinson, 145 Wis. 2d 273, 281, 426 N.W.2d 606 (Ct. App. 1988). In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191583 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lasko W. Jackson
is not required to commit false imprisonment and “[o]ne may be confined or restrained by acts or words or both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2228 - 2017-09-19
is not required to commit false imprisonment and “[o]ne may be confined or restrained by acts or words or both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2228 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Diane R.
, she did not “appear” as that word is used in § 806.02. She was, however, on notice that if she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13597 - 2017-09-21
, she did not “appear” as that word is used in § 806.02. She was, however, on notice that if she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13597 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Merlin Weber v. Town of Saukville
. If words that are used in a statute are not specifically defined, they should be accorded their commonly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8076 - 2017-09-19
. If words that are used in a statute are not specifically defined, they should be accorded their commonly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8076 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Louise Sterlinske v. School District of Bruce
.2d 737, 749, 470 N.W.2d 625, 629 (1991). Statutes using the word “shall” are presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11413 - 2017-09-19
.2d 737, 749, 470 N.W.2d 625, 629 (1991). Statutes using the word “shall” are presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11413 - 2017-09-19
Richard Bouchette v. Catherine Spatola
that was already enclosed. Rather, he charged Spatola to “close in her front porch,” in Bouchette’s words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4709 - 2005-03-31
that was already enclosed. Rather, he charged Spatola to “close in her front porch,” in Bouchette’s words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4709 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to challenge [counsel’s] words to the court that defendant wanted to plea out to the charges.” Chairse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149114 - 2017-09-21
to challenge [counsel’s] words to the court that defendant wanted to plea out to the charges.” Chairse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149114 - 2017-09-21
Lloyd DeJong v. Gerald Hoornstra
. In other words, things were dropped right in the middle of things.… [A]t the time I went over with [DeJong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14530 - 2005-03-31
. In other words, things were dropped right in the middle of things.… [A]t the time I went over with [DeJong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14530 - 2005-03-31