Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11451 - 11460 of 68517 for did.
Search results 11451 - 11460 of 68517 for did.
State v. Christopher V. Teague
Wells did not see either Teague or Hanna appear to exchange anything with the driver. After the five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31
Wells did not see either Teague or Hanna appear to exchange anything with the driver. After the five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Obuchowski
that the change in locale did not convert Obuchowski’s temporary detention into a custodial arrest. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15219 - 2017-09-21
that the change in locale did not convert Obuchowski’s temporary detention into a custodial arrest. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15219 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
were excluded as hearsay, and the State did not call the alleged victim herself to testify. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121061 - 2014-09-02
were excluded as hearsay, and the State did not call the alleged victim herself to testify. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121061 - 2014-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the door opens.” The marks on the pharmacy door did not “look like normal wear and tear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673849 - 2023-07-05
that the door opens.” The marks on the pharmacy door did not “look like normal wear and tear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673849 - 2023-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the court did not consider Lisa’s undisputed testimony that the couple moved to the Eau Claire area in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
, and the court did not consider Lisa’s undisputed testimony that the couple moved to the Eau Claire area in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
Sharon Mowery v. James E. Mowery
amount to a percentage or a fixed amount, whichever was greater. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
amount to a percentage or a fixed amount, whichever was greater. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
David J. Winkel v. Jeanette M. Wilke
’ principal claim is that the judgment is invalid because they did not receive notice of the hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
’ principal claim is that the judgment is invalid because they did not receive notice of the hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin McCraney
would have testified that McCraney did not supply the weapons used in the offense, and Xavier Hill,[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2005-03-31
would have testified that McCraney did not supply the weapons used in the offense, and Xavier Hill,[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
it,” she testified she did not remember the conversation well. When asked if she recalled witnessing Welch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34365 - 2008-10-20
it,” she testified she did not remember the conversation well. When asked if she recalled witnessing Welch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34365 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the trial court determined that Torres- Espinal did not have standing to object to the search. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759443 - 2024-02-06
, the trial court determined that Torres- Espinal did not have standing to object to the search. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759443 - 2024-02-06