Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11451 - 11460 of 58502 for o j.
Search results 11451 - 11460 of 58502 for o j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that [n]o small part of the States’ [sic] case against Mr. Meade was the fact that at the end
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
that [n]o small part of the States’ [sic] case against Mr. Meade was the fact that at the end
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with prosecution of a defendant); Romero-Perez v. Kentucky, 492 S.W.3d 902, 906 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016) (“[o]ne can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204764 - 2017-12-12
with prosecution of a defendant); Romero-Perez v. Kentucky, 492 S.W.3d 902, 906 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016) (“[o]ne can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204764 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Michael J.K.
and intimate private interests of children." ¶13From these propositions, Michael asserts that "[t]o construe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15909 - 2017-09-21
and intimate private interests of children." ¶13From these propositions, Michael asserts that "[t]o construe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15909 - 2017-09-21
Firstar Trust Company v. Richard D. Gebhardt
is employed in reviewing a decision to award attorneys’ fees. See Community Care Org. v. Evelyn O., 214 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13072 - 2005-03-31
is employed in reviewing a decision to award attorneys’ fees. See Community Care Org. v. Evelyn O., 214 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13072 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court for Marquette County: richard o. wright, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, P.J.[1] Randy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108721 - 2014-03-05
court for Marquette County: richard o. wright, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, P.J.[1] Randy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108721 - 2014-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
did not want to face life imprisonment. ¶9 “[T]o satisfy the ‘prejudice’ requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96744 - 2013-05-13
did not want to face life imprisonment. ¶9 “[T]o satisfy the ‘prejudice’ requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96744 - 2013-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). “[O]ur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
) that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). “[O]ur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Merco Distrib. Corp. v. O & R Engines, Inc., 71 Wis. 2d 792, 795-96, 239 N.W.2d 97 (1976) (“Arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144865 - 2015-07-20
Merco Distrib. Corp. v. O & R Engines, Inc., 71 Wis. 2d 792, 795-96, 239 N.W.2d 97 (1976) (“Arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144865 - 2015-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 375 (“[T]o establish that postconviction or appellate counsel was ineffective, a defendant bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89199 - 2014-09-15
, 375 (“[T]o establish that postconviction or appellate counsel was ineffective, a defendant bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89199 - 2014-09-15
Babette Grunow v. The UWM Post
brief: “[t]o hold that [UWM] is not entitled to the protections of sovereign immunity ‘would be without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15231 - 2005-03-31
brief: “[t]o hold that [UWM] is not entitled to the protections of sovereign immunity ‘would be without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15231 - 2005-03-31