Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11461 - 11470 of 30164 for de.
Search results 11461 - 11470 of 30164 for de.
Norda, Inc. v. Wisconsin Educational Approval Board
. The Board appeals. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25323 - 2014-07-01
. The Board appeals. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25323 - 2014-07-01
State v. Michael Morris
. The application of law to undisputed facts presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13251 - 2005-03-31
. The application of law to undisputed facts presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13251 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law for our de novo review. State v. White, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law for our de novo review. State v. White, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the application of constitutional principles to those findings of fact de novo. State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001019 - 2025-08-26
the application of constitutional principles to those findings of fact de novo. State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001019 - 2025-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
. The question of whether a change is substantial is a question of law that is reviewed de novo by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36778 - 2009-06-16
. The question of whether a change is substantial is a question of law that is reviewed de novo by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36778 - 2009-06-16
M-P Enterprises, Ltd. v. Society Insurance
the amended order. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Millen v. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12827 - 2005-03-31
the amended order. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Millen v. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12827 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d 433, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33050 - 2008-06-16
a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d 433, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33050 - 2008-06-16
State v. Derrick Emerson
(2) and 971.08 to undisputed facts and presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
(2) and 971.08 to undisputed facts and presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark C. Laska v. Mary Jane Laska
is resolved by resort to statutory language, an issue of law we decide de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4790 - 2017-09-20
is resolved by resort to statutory language, an issue of law we decide de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4790 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Moses Sean P.
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Cf. Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis.2d 106, 116, 287 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8981 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Cf. Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis.2d 106, 116, 287 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8981 - 2017-09-19