Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11461 - 11470 of 50100 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was ineffective by failing to advocate for less than the maximum term of commitment. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535512 - 2022-06-23

[PDF] Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
reviewed our decision and reversed without reaching the merits of our holding. The court concluded
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1245 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
withdrawal based on the ineffective assistance of counsel. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364804 - 2021-05-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138018 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. A challenge to a circuit court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153598 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial court acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122144 - 2014-09-18

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92104 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Ashley Hinrichs. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356572 - 2021-04-15

CA Blank Order
so. Upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128261 - 2014-11-18

COURT OF APPEALS
brief, Haydon concedes forfeiture of the constitutional argument and asks us to exercise our discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41446 - 2009-09-28