Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11461 - 11470 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 11461 - 11470 of 58542 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
to PTAC first-degree homicide.[1] At Sanicki’s trial, Behnke testified that Sanicki was the shooter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82149 - 2012-05-08
to PTAC first-degree homicide.[1] At Sanicki’s trial, Behnke testified that Sanicki was the shooter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82149 - 2012-05-08
[PDF]
State v. James B. Williams
trial and appellate counsel were ineffective; and (5) his sentence was unduly harsh. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5785 - 2017-09-19
trial and appellate counsel were ineffective; and (5) his sentence was unduly harsh. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5785 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the possession of a firearm by a felon count. In a postconviction motion, Smith moved for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41513 - 2014-09-15
for the possession of a firearm by a felon count. In a postconviction motion, Smith moved for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41513 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 27
fees. Sheedy asserts the trial court applied the wrong burden of proof; Maynard Steel Casting Company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31587 - 2008-02-19
fees. Sheedy asserts the trial court applied the wrong burden of proof; Maynard Steel Casting Company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31587 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles F. G.
WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1). 1 Charles argues the trial court erred by: (1) admitting statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5620 - 2017-09-19
WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1). 1 Charles argues the trial court erred by: (1) admitting statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5620 - 2017-09-19
2006 WI APP 181
Demmerly, created an actual conflict of interest.[2] He contends that the trial court had an obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26175 - 2006-09-26
Demmerly, created an actual conflict of interest.[2] He contends that the trial court had an obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26175 - 2006-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why the ultimate sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47154 - 2010-02-17
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why the ultimate sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47154 - 2010-02-17
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Posthuma
was entered on the verdict March 19, 1993. In an order entered July 18, 1994, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8016 - 2017-09-19
was entered on the verdict March 19, 1993. In an order entered July 18, 1994, the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8016 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. No. 2018AP186-CR 2 ¶2 Walker sought a new trial for three reasons. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228350 - 2018-11-27
postconviction motion. No. 2018AP186-CR 2 ¶2 Walker sought a new trial for three reasons. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228350 - 2018-11-27
State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
the trial court to balance the probative strength and relevancy of the “other acts” evidence against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12489 - 2005-03-31
the trial court to balance the probative strength and relevancy of the “other acts” evidence against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12489 - 2005-03-31