Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 30033 for consulta de causas.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 30033 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de novo based on the circuit court’s factual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444660 - 2021-10-26
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de novo based on the circuit court’s factual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444660 - 2021-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
. Downey attempted to have that decision reviewed de novo by the circuit court and then by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112074 - 2014-05-13
. Downey attempted to have that decision reviewed de novo by the circuit court and then by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112074 - 2014-05-13
David Kosmo v. State
a claim upon which relief may be granted is a question of law that we review de novo. Heinritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10646 - 2005-03-31
a claim upon which relief may be granted is a question of law that we review de novo. Heinritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10646 - 2005-03-31
Town of Union v. City of Eau Claire
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. See Agnes T. v. Milwaukee County, 189 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6003 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. See Agnes T. v. Milwaukee County, 189 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6003 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel C. Clussman
it prejudiced the defendant, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis.2d 1, 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
it prejudiced the defendant, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis.2d 1, 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dale W. Repinski
and prejudicial based on the established facts, however, are questions of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10180 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial based on the established facts, however, are questions of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10180 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Russell I. Bratt v. Roger D. Peirce
-1480 4 § 802.08(2) (1999-2000)3 to the record de novo. Wegner v. Heritage Mut. Ins. Co., 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2652 - 2017-09-19
-1480 4 § 802.08(2) (1999-2000)3 to the record de novo. Wegner v. Heritage Mut. Ins. Co., 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2652 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217482 - 2018-08-07
of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217482 - 2018-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process rights presents a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Sturdivant, 2009 WI App 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85130 - 2014-09-15
process rights presents a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Sturdivant, 2009 WI App 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85130 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
facts meet a legal standard is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bahr v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15760 - 2017-09-21
facts meet a legal standard is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bahr v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15760 - 2017-09-21