Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 33987 for dismissed.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 33987 for dismissed.
State v. Xavier Lorenzo Brown
Brown which were later dismissed after sentencing. Brown also argues that his sentence was unduly harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9491 - 2005-03-31
Brown which were later dismissed after sentencing. Brown also argues that his sentence was unduly harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9491 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss the complaint, claiming that a lack of specificity in the charging documents precluded him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97794 - 2013-06-10
to dismiss the complaint, claiming that a lack of specificity in the charging documents precluded him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97794 - 2013-06-10
State v. Christopher C. Johnson
to the robbery count and the remaining counts would be dismissed, although each dismissed count would be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5786 - 2005-03-31
to the robbery count and the remaining counts would be dismissed, although each dismissed count would be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for failing to file a motion to dismiss based on the lost video and because Singh failed to adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15
for failing to file a motion to dismiss based on the lost video and because Singh failed to adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dale G. Latus v. James Johnson
dismissing his complaint against James Johnson and Gerald Cutsforth for tortious interference with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12395 - 2017-09-21
dismissing his complaint against James Johnson and Gerald Cutsforth for tortious interference with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, raising the same arguments. The district court dismissed his petition, and the federal court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
, raising the same arguments. The district court dismissed his petition, and the federal court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
State v. David E. Williams
was dismissed because Williams failed to pay the filing fee. Thus, the trial court dismissed the May 7, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31
was dismissed because Williams failed to pay the filing fee. Thus, the trial court dismissed the May 7, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the State and Conner that, if Conner testified against Stewart, the State would dismiss the pending first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192379 - 2017-09-21
the State and Conner that, if Conner testified against Stewart, the State would dismiss the pending first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). We dismiss the appeal for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). We dismiss the appeal for lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
Scott M.H. v. Kathleen M.H.
of Richard.” Despite this finding, the court dismissed the injunction action, instead taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12244 - 2017-09-21
of Richard.” Despite this finding, the court dismissed the injunction action, instead taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12244 - 2017-09-21