Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 64056 for records/1000.
Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr. v. Mary C. Volker
this action solely to harass her. The record fully supports these conclusions. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7769 - 2005-03-31
this action solely to harass her. The record fully supports these conclusions. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7769 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260755 - 2020-05-21
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260755 - 2020-05-21
State v. Kristen K. Gamer
an adequate record of its sentencing discretion and remand for it to do so. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
an adequate record of its sentencing discretion and remand for it to do so. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9021 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl J. Knapp
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9261 - 2005-03-31
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9261 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131858 - 2014-12-14
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131858 - 2014-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS
that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s argument and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31141 - 2007-12-10
that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s argument and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31141 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
Edward Frank Finn v. Debra M. Finn
(1982). Discretion implies a rational mental process in which the facts of record and the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15081 - 2017-09-21
(1982). Discretion implies a rational mental process in which the facts of record and the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188877 - 2017-09-21
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188877 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119177 - 2014-08-11
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119177 - 2014-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248639 - 2019-10-16
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248639 - 2019-10-16