Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 64056 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105609 - 2017-09-21
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105609 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carl J. Knapp
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
Allen J. Thomas v. State
acquitted on the same charge in 1975 and if the trial court would have examined the 1975 record, it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8506 - 2017-09-19
acquitted on the same charge in 1975 and if the trial court would have examined the 1975 record, it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8506 - 2017-09-19
Woodland Hills Land Company v. County of Door
very little authority to review the board's decision and that the record contains an adequate factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9542 - 2005-03-31
very little authority to review the board's decision and that the record contains an adequate factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9542 - 2005-03-31
Ellen M. Rhode v. Dennis E. Rhode
and will not be upset on appeal if the decision reflects a rational mental process by which the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8658 - 2005-03-31
and will not be upset on appeal if the decision reflects a rational mental process by which the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
upon the record to justify their individual acts. That their acts have no basis in fact or law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
upon the record to justify their individual acts. That their acts have no basis in fact or law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, as mandated by Anders v. California, 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191932 - 2017-09-21
of the record, as mandated by Anders v. California, 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191932 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then filed a response to the supplemental no-merit report. Our review of the record reveals an issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110625 - 2017-09-21
then filed a response to the supplemental no-merit report. Our review of the record reveals an issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110625 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695280 - 2023-08-30
consideration of the no-merit report and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695280 - 2023-08-30