Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 19231 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 19231 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3)(a)-(b). Further, we have not considered the affidavits, purportedly from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680940 - 2023-07-25
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3)(a)-(b). Further, we have not considered the affidavits, purportedly from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680940 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Jiles
. 262.17 (1) (b) provides for proof of service by affidavit and ss. 269.32, 269.45, 270.50 and 270.635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19
. 262.17 (1) (b) provides for proof of service by affidavit and ss. 269.32, 269.45, 270.50 and 270.635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19
Jessica L. Edwardson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
to the park to have fun” and “to grab a bite to eat.” According to their affidavits, neither Molencupp nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14104 - 2005-03-31
to the park to have fun” and “to grab a bite to eat.” According to their affidavits, neither Molencupp nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14104 - 2005-03-31
William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
in an affidavit submitted to the trial court as his “mistake” in assuming that, because the introductory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2012-08-09
in an affidavit submitted to the trial court as his “mistake” in assuming that, because the introductory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2012-08-09
CA Blank Order
testified. [Sumlin] merely states that he would have provided other evidence. His affidavit provides
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101375 - 2013-08-22
testified. [Sumlin] merely states that he would have provided other evidence. His affidavit provides
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101375 - 2013-08-22
Alisa Zehetner v. Chrysler Financial Company, LLC
for credit to finance the purchase, but his credit application was denied. According to Zehetner’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6548 - 2005-03-31
for credit to finance the purchase, but his credit application was denied. According to Zehetner’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6548 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction, McCaskill submitted to the circuit court an affidavit and transcripts from his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172252 - 2017-09-21
conviction, McCaskill submitted to the circuit court an affidavit and transcripts from his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172252 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
raised the issue after the State rested its case. The defense filed an affidavit showing the subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
raised the issue after the State rested its case. The defense filed an affidavit showing the subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and on appeal, the State relies heavily upon an affidavit of the arresting deputy submitted as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171761 - 2017-09-21
and on appeal, the State relies heavily upon an affidavit of the arresting deputy submitted as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171761 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joshua Slagoski
was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information. In support, he offers the affidavit of another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information. In support, he offers the affidavit of another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31