Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 19312 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 19312 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
award of attorney fees, the trial court considered: the factors articulated in Pierce; an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30
award of attorney fees, the trial court considered: the factors articulated in Pierce; an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30
State v. Joshua Slagoski
was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information. In support, he offers the affidavit of another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information. In support, he offers the affidavit of another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
George J. and Mary V. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Aftab Ansari
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Jiles
. 262.17 (1) (b) provides for proof of service by affidavit and ss. 269.32, 269.45, 270.50 and 270.635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19
. 262.17 (1) (b) provides for proof of service by affidavit and ss. 269.32, 269.45, 270.50 and 270.635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lucinda B.
. An affidavit of No. 03-0908 9 service, admitted into evidence, reflects that two unsuccessful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6343 - 2017-09-19
. An affidavit of No. 03-0908 9 service, admitted into evidence, reflects that two unsuccessful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6343 - 2017-09-19
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
raised the issue after the State rested its case. The defense filed an affidavit showing the subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
raised the issue after the State rested its case. The defense filed an affidavit showing the subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 131
construction equipment, tools and other similar equipment.[3] ¶3 An affidavit by United Rentals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28806 - 2007-07-11
construction equipment, tools and other similar equipment.[3] ¶3 An affidavit by United Rentals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28806 - 2007-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 82.27 applicant must file an affidavit that “recites facts that satisfy the board that” the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143684 - 2015-06-29
. § 82.27 applicant must file an affidavit that “recites facts that satisfy the board that” the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143684 - 2015-06-29
State v. Patrick A. Peterson
affidavit. Aside from repeating what is already in the affidavit, Peterson has not explained what other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3676 - 2005-03-31
affidavit. Aside from repeating what is already in the affidavit, Peterson has not explained what other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3676 - 2005-03-31
W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Division of Highways & Transportation
the motion for enlargement. Merten avers in his affidavit that at the pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31
the motion for enlargement. Merten avers in his affidavit that at the pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31