Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11481 - 11490 of 16449 for commentating.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
The amended judgment of conviction in this case includes a scrivener’s error. Although the “comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128637 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gary A. Johnson
, Dummer stated that Johnson appeared to be reaching underneath his front seat. Dummer commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20601 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
). Broecker also asserts, again without citing any authority, that the officer improperly commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28471 - 2007-03-20

State v. Lawrence J. Fields
, it commented that the stop was justified under the community caretaker doctrine. The court thought the delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2383 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
. We perceive Verkuilen to have taken the court’s comments out of context. However, even if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27895 - 2007-01-22

COURT OF APPEALS
professionals about this wall was a standard form comment that he routinely included in his reports.” ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47251 - 2010-02-22

[PDF] State v. Crystal C. Parker
the “outrageous claim” that Raeburn was trying to rape her. He commented that he found it “very disturbing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5471 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jay M. Timm
.” While the trial court’s comments in this case focused more on the benefits that an attorney could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4274 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andrew J. Jennings
of the detectives suggested to Jennings that the child might have initiated the sexual contact. This comment may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6434 - 2005-03-31

Appeal No
on July 16, 2002, the court later clarified that its comment had “equal application to the entire period
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26690 - 2006-10-04