Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11481 - 11490 of 64056 for records/1000.

[PDF] NOTICE
because certain medical records were admitted at trial by stipulation of the parties, thus violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44982 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149115 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695280 - 2023-08-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174941 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Patrick A. Hayden
reviewed the record. We conclude that an appeal would lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8395 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Scheeler first argues that he should be given a new trial because certain medical records were admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44982 - 2009-12-22

[PDF] State v. Mario Harris
The postconviction court reviewed the trial record and also considered trial counsel’s affidavit acknowledging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16183 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254088 - 2020-02-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105609 - 2017-09-21

State v. Carl J. Knapp
, although the conviction was not supported by any official record. However, Knapp did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31