Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11491 - 11500 of 30150 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53243 - 2010-08-11

Robert Derks v. Town of Seven Mile Creek
OF REVIEW ¶7 We review judgments granting directed verdicts de novo. A directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4126 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
principles to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42813 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Melvin A. Neuman v. Circuit Court for Marathon County
) is a matter of statutory interpretation, and thus is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15265 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. See id. This presents an issue of law for our de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684095 - 2023-08-01

[PDF] NOTICE
de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. State v. Young, 2006 WI 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39047 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
clearly erroneous, then review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343880 - 2021-03-09

[PDF] State v. Steve A. Johnson
is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13029 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is a question of constitutional fact that is reviewed de novo. State v. Kempainen, 2015 WI 32, ¶16, 361 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214544 - 2018-06-27

State v. Linda M. Graff
was reasonable presents a question of constitutional law, which we review de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6045 - 2005-03-31