Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11491 - 11500 of 83389 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
at 715/346-1244 at 9:30 a.m. on 12/03/08 or his case would be dismissed. ¶3 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36612 - 2009-05-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06

[PDF] State v. Todd D.S.
or of the public to hear the case, the court shall enter an order waving jurisdiction." Whether to waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2849 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a response. Stephens has not responded. I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600834 - 2022-12-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06

State v. Todd D.S.
be contrary to the best interests of the juvenile or of the public to hear the case, the court shall enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2849 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence at the preliminary hearing; (2) failing to object to Ellis’s warrantless arrest, search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36480 - 2009-05-18

Daniel J. Lenhart v. Robert L. Kisting
the version supporting their respective theory of the case. We summarily reject the Lenharts’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11979 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
searches and seizures [must] be objectively reasonable under the circumstances existing at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85795 - 2012-08-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848277 - 2024-09-10