Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 6309 for 208.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is not merely cumulative.” Plude, 310 Wis. 2d 28, ¶32 (citation omitted); State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186835 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 893.80(1g). In Probst v. Winnebago County, 208 Wis. 2d 280, 560 N.W.2d 291 (Ct. App. 1997)—one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676066 - 2023-07-07

[PDF] State v. Melvin R. Tucker
. Hoffman, 106 Wis.2d 185, 208, 316 N.W.2d 143, 156 (Ct. App. 1982). Section 971.12(1) is to be broadly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7863 - 2017-09-19

State v. Joshua L. Howland
the importance of the PSI to the sentencing process. State v. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 518, 561 N.W.2d 332 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5529 - 2005-03-31

State v. Melvin R. Tucker
is a question of law. State v. Hoffman, 106 Wis.2d 185, 208, 316 N.W.2d 143, 156 (Ct. App. 1982). Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7864 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. State v. Dukes, 2007 WI App 175, ¶26, 303 Wis. 2d 208, 736 N.W.2d 515. A court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221655 - 2018-10-10

State v. Melvin R. Tucker
is a question of law. State v. Hoffman, 106 Wis.2d 185, 208, 316 N.W.2d 143, 156 (Ct. App. 1982). Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7863 - 2005-03-31

State v. Melvin R. Tucker
is a question of law. State v. Hoffman, 106 Wis.2d 185, 208, 316 N.W.2d 143, 156 (Ct. App. 1982). Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7865 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Melvin R. Tucker
. Hoffman, 106 Wis.2d 185, 208, 316 N.W.2d 143, 156 (Ct. App. 1982). Section 971.12(1) is to be broadly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7864 - 2017-09-19

Nesbitt Farms, LLC v. City of Madison
of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259, 265, 559 N.W.2d 914 (Ct. App. 1997) (actions to appeal a county board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5576 - 2005-03-31