Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 3959 for davi.

[PDF] Racine County Human Services Department v. Frank W.
case is the best interests of the child. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7620 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
as requiring juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. In State v. Davis, 2017 WI App 55, ¶9, 377 Wis. 2d 678, 901 N.W.2d 488, we held consistent with WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252653 - 2020-01-22

State v. Tyrone Davis Smith
, v. TYRONE DAVIS SMITH, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10365 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05

COURT OF APPEALS
, this issue was resolved by Davis v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2419, 2423-24 (2011), after this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78531 - 2012-02-28

Richard D. Price, Jr. v. Zimbrick, Inc.
a position in a legal proceeding and then subsequently asserting an inconsistent position.’” Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14550 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. LABOR AND INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, PAUL DAVIS RESTORATION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35129 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶19, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15

Timara Young v. Dusan Matic
Management, Inc., a non-domestic corporation, and Arthur Davis, Defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12025 - 2005-03-31